← All reads
RECAPMLB · Aug 6, 2026 · 5 MIN · Arcline Analytics

Crow-Armstrong Torched Us and We Still Went 1-1

Wednesday's card split on totals, the Wrigley under turned into a fireworks show, and Pete Crow-Armstrong put up 37 DK points against our under ticket. Here's the honest accounting.

00 · THE DAY

Wednesday gave us 15 games, two totals with material edge, and a split — one clean win and one that wasn't particularly close to going our way. No moneyline sides cleared the bar, which is an honest reflection of what the market looked like, not a shy pass. The model found two totals worth publishing and went 1-1. That's the record. Straightforward.

The headline story, at least from a DFS standpoint, came out of Wrigley Field, where the Los Angeles Dodgers and Chicago Cubs combined for 13 runs in a game we had ticketed as an under. More on that shortly. The other side of the ledger — Detroit and Seattle staying quiet — is exactly the kind of game that makes you feel smart for exactly one evening before you remember the Wrigley game.

01 · THE CARD, GRADED

Two published totals. Here is how they landed.

  • LAD @ CHC — Under 9.5 — LOSS. Final: Cubs 7, Dodgers 6. Thirteen runs. The line was 9.5. We needed the game to stay under that; it went over by more than three. No moral victories here — an under that gives up 13 runs is just a loss, full stop.
  • DET @ SEA — Under 8 — WIN. Final: Mariners 4, Tigers 2. Six total runs against a line of 8. This one did exactly what a clean under is supposed to do — the offenses were quieter than the market expected, the pitching held, and it wasn't a sweat. Six runs on an 8-total is a comfortable cover.

Totals record on the day: 1-1. Moneyline record: 0-0-0 (no plays published). Running the card straight is part of the deal here — you deserve to know what we actually put out, not just the ones that worked.

02 · RESULTS & DFS ANGLE

Wednesday's DFS slate was large — 464 players scored, 273 matched to our projections. Let's go through the names that mattered.

Top Scorers on the Day

  • Pete Crow-Armstrong, Chicago Cubs — 37.0 DK points. Line: 3-for-5, 2 HR, 4 RBI. Our projection: 10.93 points. He went out and hit two home runs in the game we had ticketed as an under. The universe has a sense of humor.
  • Noah Cameron, Kansas City Royals — 35.6 DK points. Line: 8.0 IP, 9 K, 1 ER. Our projection: 12.39 points. Projected salary: $6,500. He more than tripled his projected output and was one of the day's standout values.
  • Mitch Bratt, Arizona Diamondbacks — 35.4 DK points. Line: 7.0 IP, 9 K, 0 ER. We did not have a projection on Bratt — he is not in our matched set, so we will credit the result without claiming the call.
  • Kyle Harrison, Milwaukee Brewers — 34.0 DK points. Line: 5.0 IP, 10 K, 0 ER. Our projection: 17.78 points. Excellent day for him, nearly double our already-solid projection.
  • Shohei Ohtani, Los Angeles Dodgers — 33.0 DK points. Line: 3-for-5, 2 HR, 3 RBI. Our projection: 11.78 points. He also contributed to the Wrigley run total we were rooting against, which is a very Shohei Ohtani thing to do to an under ticket.

Where Our Projections Hit

  • Pete Crow-Armstrong — projected 10.93, scored 37.0. Call it directionally correct that we had him in the pool; the magnitude was something else entirely. The two-homer game was not something we or anyone else modeled confidently at that projection number.
  • Noah Cameron — projected 12.39, scored 35.6. At $6,500 on DraftKings, this was a legitimate value call. He delivered nearly three times his projection. That is the kind of upside at that salary range that builds winning lineups.
  • Kyle Harrison — projected 17.78, scored 34.0. Our highest projection of the three, and he still nearly doubled it. Ten strikeouts in five innings with a zero on the board is a good night by any measure.

Where We Missed

  • Casey Mize, San Diego Padres — projected 14.56, scored -13.7. Line: 3.1 IP, 1 K, 8 ER. Eight earned runs. Eight. He was one of the primary reasons to avoid his slate entirely in hindsight, and we did not avoid him. That is a significant miss and it cost lineups that leaned on him heavily.
  • Kyle Schwarber, Philadelphia Phillies — projected 12.69, scored 4.0. Line: 0-for-3. Zero hits, a strikeout-heavy night. Schwarber days like this happen, but the projection gap stings.
  • Eric Lauer, Los Angeles Dodgers — projected 12.59, scored -7.6. Line: 4.0 IP, 1 K, 6 ER. Two pitchers in the worst-calls column is a rough day for the rotation-heavy DFS builds. Six earned runs in four innings from a Dodgers starter is a reminder that projection misses on pitchers carry a heavier penalty than almost any other position.

On the whole: the top of the slate was spectacular, and we had two of the three best calls correctly flagged. The bottom of the slate — particularly the two pitchers — was genuinely painful. That is Wednesday's honest DFS accounting.

03 · WHAT WE LEARNED

A few things worth carrying forward.

First, the Wrigley game is a reminder that a run environment call and a DFS construction call can point in opposite directions simultaneously. We liked the under, and the best DFS performer on the slate exploded in that exact game. Both things can be true. The under was a legitimate read on expected run environment — 13 runs on a 9.5 total is variance, not a broken process — but if you were also playing Crow-Armstrong in your lineups, Wednesday was complicated to navigate emotionally. That tension is real and worth naming.

Second, pitcher volatility in DFS is the most dangerous asymmetry on the board. Cameron gave us 35 points. Mize gave us -13.7. Both were starters. The gap between those outcomes is nearly 50 DraftKings points, and no model catches that gap reliably. Roster construction that manages pitcher downside — through exposure limits, stacking, or simply staying off fragile arms — is the lesson that Wednesday writes in red ink.

Third, the totals model went 1-1 on a night where it found two plays. That is a split, not a trend. We will keep tracking it honestly, game by game, and let the record speak over a meaningful sample. That is all we can do.

Written by Arcline AnalyticsSee today's card →